In fact, the drone "black fly" also brought a brand new market, namely the "anti-UAV" market. According to industry forecasts, the anti-UAV market will grow at a rate of approximately 24% per year between 2017 and 2022. By 2022, the total market will reach $1.14 billion. 
Five years ago, for most people, drones were a strange word in life. It was a military weapon used in the high-tech of national defense. However, with the rise of technology martial arts technology, drones have successfully transferred from military use to civilian use, especially at a lower price. For a time, hundreds of schools and even consumer-grade UAVs contend.
According to statistics, the global market for UAVs in 2013 was 2 billion U.S. dollars. In 2014, the market size reached 2.7 billion U.S. dollars, a year-on-year increase of 35%. In 2015, the market size was 3.6 billion U.S. dollars, a year-on-year increase of 33%. It is estimated that the global UAV market will reach US$25.9 billion in 2020, with a CAGR of 42%.
In addition, according to the Internet Data Center (IDC) forecast, by 2019, the annual sales of global drones will reach 3.93 million civilians, including 3 million consumer-grade units, CAGR will reach 60%, and industrial-grade drones will sell 930,000 units. , CAGR will reach 45%.
According to Reuters, as of August 9 this year, the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has reported more than 650 unauthorized drone witnesses. Compared with 238 UAV sightings in 2015, it is expected that the number of full-year 2016 will exceed 1,000, which will quadruple.
In recent years, news of drones in sensitive areas has frequently appeared in newspapers. U.S. White House, South Korea’s Qingwatai, Japanese Prime Minister’s official residence and other security sites have had UAV invasions. Obviously, drones are becoming a new tool for criminals to steal secret information and endanger national security, and the sales of consumer-grade drones is one of the "culprits".
Therefore, in the consumer-grade UAV market, the development of the spurt-type development, the frequent occurrence of drone accidents, the public's awareness of the drone's rules are becoming more and more serious, and the solution to the drone defense problem has become more urgent. . Although countries have introduced relevant laws and regulations to control the flight of drones, they have only reduced the phenomenon of drones and "flying".
In the United States, the United States Federal Aviation Administration's draft approval specification for commercial drones stipulates that drones cannot fly over the crowd. This has obvious reasons for safety considerations, but it also limits drones in the city. The numerous applications have led to a lot of whispers for a lot of businesses and drone enthusiasts. Nowadays, the US Federal Aviation Administration officially aims to liberate the application of drones. The problem of flying over the crowd is good, and it is further opened in the final version of the specification. The four types of drones can fly over people and even the crowd.
In the UK, the British Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has decided to issue revised operating guidelines for consumer drone users. The “Dronecode†rule is designed to ensure that consumers can use drones safely and legally, and is supported by major airlines, drone retailers and manufacturers, and the UK Department of Transportation.
In China, there is currently no law to prohibit drone activities, but to some extent restrict the "floating" of drones. For example, the “Interim Regulations on the Administration of Civil Aircraft Unmanned Aerial Vehicles†and the “Interim Regulations on the Management of Drivers for Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systemsâ€, etc., the relevant departments still lack effective means of stopping the control of drones in violation of laws and regulations.
In fact, the drone "black fly" also brought a brand new market, namely the "anti-UAV" market.
In February 2016, according to the “anti-UAV market report†first released by the foreign market research institute Markets & Markets, the anti-UAV market will grow at a rate of about 24% per year between 2017 and 2022, and by 2022, the market will be The total will reach 1.14 billion US dollars. Although the scale of this market is far less than that of mobile phones and PCs, the potential is still very large due to the scarcity of practitioners and small competition.
In foreign countries, drone monitoring vendors are emerging, and some drones have been derived to capture, interfere, and destroy equipment. In China, the main monitoring is conducted by the military or AVIC, and the monitoring and management of civilian consumer-grade drones. Very few systems. Most counterfeit drone companies at home and abroad are doing UAV blocker related equipment.
For example, the Dutch police used the eagle, the Japanese police used drones to capture the dangerous drones, and Australia developed an anti-UAV gun called DroneGun. In China, the first set of decoyed civil drones prevention and control system, which is the global "black-flying enemies", was born, namely the ADS2000 series decoy civil drone control system independently developed by the Beidou Security Research Institute Tianheng team.
In fact, domestic and foreign anti-UAV companies will face a reality - anti-UAV equipment may not be sold to the community. In the United States, those "anti-UAV technology" clearly and in detail indicate that such devices cannot and may not be sold or leased in the United States, unless they are sold or leased to the US government and government agencies, provided that It was approved by the US Federal Communications Commission. In China, jammers are basically military police, but now the public security department has not specified relevant standards for the procurement of such equipment.
The reason is that on the one hand, the "anti-UAV artifact" currently on the market is essentially an interference and control device that interferes with and suppresses the commands issued by the drone controller by emitting radio signals. The drone's WiFi signal relies on WEP encryption, and the signal connection between the drone and the operator even uses a more insecure protocol, making the drone vulnerable to "man in the middle" attacks. On the other hand, security vulnerabilities in anti-UAV equipment are also critical. Disgraced people may use loopholes to hijack anti-UAV software to control legitimate drones.
"Black flying artifact" frequently out of the anti-UAV market, the blue ocean is gradually approaching
As the threshold of consumer-grade drones is getting lower and lower, sales are getting higher and higher, and the same "black fly" and "flying" incidents of drones are also frequent, even seriously threatening people's daily life and production safety. In order to solve this problem, countries around the world have launched measures to combat "black fly", and major companies have also frequently "black technology."According to statistics, the global market for UAVs in 2013 was 2 billion U.S. dollars. In 2014, the market size reached 2.7 billion U.S. dollars, a year-on-year increase of 35%. In 2015, the market size was 3.6 billion U.S. dollars, a year-on-year increase of 33%. It is estimated that the global UAV market will reach US$25.9 billion in 2020, with a CAGR of 42%.
In addition, according to the Internet Data Center (IDC) forecast, by 2019, the annual sales of global drones will reach 3.93 million civilians, including 3 million consumer-grade units, CAGR will reach 60%, and industrial-grade drones will sell 930,000 units. , CAGR will reach 45%.
According to Reuters, as of August 9 this year, the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has reported more than 650 unauthorized drone witnesses. Compared with 238 UAV sightings in 2015, it is expected that the number of full-year 2016 will exceed 1,000, which will quadruple.
In recent years, news of drones in sensitive areas has frequently appeared in newspapers. U.S. White House, South Korea’s Qingwatai, Japanese Prime Minister’s official residence and other security sites have had UAV invasions. Obviously, drones are becoming a new tool for criminals to steal secret information and endanger national security, and the sales of consumer-grade drones is one of the "culprits".
Therefore, in the consumer-grade UAV market, the development of the spurt-type development, the frequent occurrence of drone accidents, the public's awareness of the drone's rules are becoming more and more serious, and the solution to the drone defense problem has become more urgent. . Although countries have introduced relevant laws and regulations to control the flight of drones, they have only reduced the phenomenon of drones and "flying".
In the United States, the United States Federal Aviation Administration's draft approval specification for commercial drones stipulates that drones cannot fly over the crowd. This has obvious reasons for safety considerations, but it also limits drones in the city. The numerous applications have led to a lot of whispers for a lot of businesses and drone enthusiasts. Nowadays, the US Federal Aviation Administration officially aims to liberate the application of drones. The problem of flying over the crowd is good, and it is further opened in the final version of the specification. The four types of drones can fly over people and even the crowd.
In the UK, the British Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has decided to issue revised operating guidelines for consumer drone users. The “Dronecode†rule is designed to ensure that consumers can use drones safely and legally, and is supported by major airlines, drone retailers and manufacturers, and the UK Department of Transportation.
In China, there is currently no law to prohibit drone activities, but to some extent restrict the "floating" of drones. For example, the “Interim Regulations on the Administration of Civil Aircraft Unmanned Aerial Vehicles†and the “Interim Regulations on the Management of Drivers for Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systemsâ€, etc., the relevant departments still lack effective means of stopping the control of drones in violation of laws and regulations.
In fact, the drone "black fly" also brought a brand new market, namely the "anti-UAV" market.
In February 2016, according to the “anti-UAV market report†first released by the foreign market research institute Markets & Markets, the anti-UAV market will grow at a rate of about 24% per year between 2017 and 2022, and by 2022, the market will be The total will reach 1.14 billion US dollars. Although the scale of this market is far less than that of mobile phones and PCs, the potential is still very large due to the scarcity of practitioners and small competition.
In foreign countries, drone monitoring vendors are emerging, and some drones have been derived to capture, interfere, and destroy equipment. In China, the main monitoring is conducted by the military or AVIC, and the monitoring and management of civilian consumer-grade drones. Very few systems. Most counterfeit drone companies at home and abroad are doing UAV blocker related equipment.
For example, the Dutch police used the eagle, the Japanese police used drones to capture the dangerous drones, and Australia developed an anti-UAV gun called DroneGun. In China, the first set of decoyed civil drones prevention and control system, which is the global "black-flying enemies", was born, namely the ADS2000 series decoy civil drone control system independently developed by the Beidou Security Research Institute Tianheng team.
In fact, domestic and foreign anti-UAV companies will face a reality - anti-UAV equipment may not be sold to the community. In the United States, those "anti-UAV technology" clearly and in detail indicate that such devices cannot and may not be sold or leased in the United States, unless they are sold or leased to the US government and government agencies, provided that It was approved by the US Federal Communications Commission. In China, jammers are basically military police, but now the public security department has not specified relevant standards for the procurement of such equipment.
The reason is that on the one hand, the "anti-UAV artifact" currently on the market is essentially an interference and control device that interferes with and suppresses the commands issued by the drone controller by emitting radio signals. The drone's WiFi signal relies on WEP encryption, and the signal connection between the drone and the operator even uses a more insecure protocol, making the drone vulnerable to "man in the middle" attacks. On the other hand, security vulnerabilities in anti-UAV equipment are also critical. Disgraced people may use loopholes to hijack anti-UAV software to control legitimate drones.
60W Medical Power Supply,Medical Power Supply Adapter,Power Supply For Medical Equipment,Medical Dc Dc Converter
Shenzhen Longxc Power Supply Co., Ltd , https://www.longxcpower.com