The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology official stated that it would distinguish intellectual property rights from Shanzhai products, instead of directly denying or affirming the enterprises or products. "Imitation is also an innovation, but also a kind of development", "the use of innovative results, but also promote social progress" (December 1 "Beijing Times").
Imitation does not mean plagiarism. Counterfeiting is not tantamount to forgery. The treatment of Shanzhai products should also be treated as such. Some imitations are actual innovations and transcendental ones. Even more, they cannot be given the charge of “shanzhai productsâ€. For example, our four major inventions were imitated by foreign countries and foreign countries did not think that they were cottage products. Today, Chinese characters are imitated by foreign countries. Food is imitated by foreign countries, and foreign countries do not think this is a copycat product. On the contrary, we imitate the manufacture of a foreign product, such as a computer, etc. The core uses its own technology and wisdom. It is an improvement over the original product. Such a product is already an innovative product.
Innovation has a broad and narrow sense. Direct creation is innovation. The use and expansion of innovation results are also innovations and need encouragement. If imitation and counterfeiting are regarded as plagiarism and forgery, and on the ground that intellectual property rights are protected, they must not be remanufactured as they are. Even if the remanufacturing is completely different from the original product, this is both a kind of overbearing and a kind of ignorance.
Intellectual property rights are the watershed of Shanzhai products. One divides into two to treat cottage products, cottage products will be clearly identified. The infringement of intellectual property rights cannot be avoided, and no infringement can be misunderstood. If it infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, it shall pay the manufacturer or patent owner who owns the intellectual property rights a corresponding fee: If imitation does not infringe upon the object claimed by the patentee, it shall be Its correct name allows its production. If there is innovation in imitating and even helping others to achieve a breakthrough, it will not only allow their production, but also support their production, encourage their production, allow them to expand their markets, increase their market share, and allow more people to enjoy innovations. Only when this seems fair and just can we accelerate social progress.
Imitation does not mean plagiarism. Counterfeiting is not tantamount to forgery. The treatment of Shanzhai products should also be treated as such. Some imitations are actual innovations and transcendental ones. Even more, they cannot be given the charge of “shanzhai productsâ€. For example, our four major inventions were imitated by foreign countries and foreign countries did not think that they were cottage products. Today, Chinese characters are imitated by foreign countries. Food is imitated by foreign countries, and foreign countries do not think this is a copycat product. On the contrary, we imitate the manufacture of a foreign product, such as a computer, etc. The core uses its own technology and wisdom. It is an improvement over the original product. Such a product is already an innovative product.
Innovation has a broad and narrow sense. Direct creation is innovation. The use and expansion of innovation results are also innovations and need encouragement. If imitation and counterfeiting are regarded as plagiarism and forgery, and on the ground that intellectual property rights are protected, they must not be remanufactured as they are. Even if the remanufacturing is completely different from the original product, this is both a kind of overbearing and a kind of ignorance.
Intellectual property rights are the watershed of Shanzhai products. One divides into two to treat cottage products, cottage products will be clearly identified. The infringement of intellectual property rights cannot be avoided, and no infringement can be misunderstood. If it infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, it shall pay the manufacturer or patent owner who owns the intellectual property rights a corresponding fee: If imitation does not infringe upon the object claimed by the patentee, it shall be Its correct name allows its production. If there is innovation in imitating and even helping others to achieve a breakthrough, it will not only allow their production, but also support their production, encourage their production, allow them to expand their markets, increase their market share, and allow more people to enjoy innovations. Only when this seems fair and just can we accelerate social progress.
IH Optics Co., Ltd. , http://www.gdjointclosure.com