Customers Abandon Third Party to Identify Lehman Opto LED Dispute Progress

January 17 reported that the quality of Lehman Optoelectronics products was questioned by customers. Although four customers strongly condemned “thunder bursts”, the customer did not publish the third party appraisal. Lehman Optoelectronics also emphasized that it did not see the above appraisal. .

However, after the "thunderstorm", the customer began to "rain": According to the materials provided by the customer yesterday, the product of Lehman Optoelectronics was LS-DTEP-FEN2-025.0*5.0mm, and the customer commissioned the quality of national semiconductor devices. The inspection and inspection center conducted inspections, and the inspection concluded that 37 of the 60 samples were unqualified. Lehman Optoelectronics stated that quality disputes can be resolved through negotiation or legal channels.

More than sixty percent of the submitted samples failed

The author noticed that according to the materials issued by the relevant person in charge of one of Lehman Optoelectronics's four major customers, Li Xiangguang’s customers have refuted four issues concerning Lehman Optoelectronics' alleged client’s malicious default payment. One of the important contents is that It was Li Xianghui Co., Ltd. that entrusted the National Semiconductor Device Quality Supervision and Inspection Center to test the sample of Lehman Optronics Model LS-DTEP-FEN2-025.0*5.0mm, and the inspection report number is w2012-615(b). The conclusion is “This test product, according to the notary provided by the entrusted entity: (2012) 冀Shi Guomin Minzi No. 1863 page 7 of 12 relating to the relevant test conditions and user orders, a total of 60 samples, 23 samples qualified, 37 Sample failed."

According to statistics, the National Semiconductor Device Quality Supervision and Inspection Center is administratively affiliated with the 13th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation. It is directly subordinate to the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, and the Ministry of Information Industry, and is managed by the National Certification and Accreditation Regulatory Commission. The center was established in 1986 and is one of the first batch of 100 state-level centers planned by the country. It has certain authority in the industry.

Earlier, the customers who jointly claimed Lehman Optoelectronics had stated that they had a third-party appraisal, but they did not issue it at that time, and Lehman Optoelectronics' response was that it had never seen any third-party appraisal. Now this represents the focus of the dispute between the two parties. Tripartite identification has surfaced.

Company: Negotiable or legal solution

The author yesterday telephoned the National Semiconductor Device Quality Supervision and Inspection Center on the inspection report. The relevant person in the center told the reporter that Lixiang Huike had commissioned the center to inspect the relevant products. The time was about November last year, and the inspection time was about 2 more. Month, when a total of 3 products were tested, "the inspection report mainly shows how many samples are bad at the same time," said the above. However, what were the specific inspection items and what performance problems the product had, because no specific inspection personnel were contacted and the details were not known.

“We don’t want to fight a war of words”, the relevant person in charge of Lehman Optoelectronics Customer Company told the author that the material published this time was a rebuttal against the inaccuracies in the Lehman Opto-electronics clarification report. The material also contained the above critical Third-party certification report.

Regarding the above actions and statements of customers, Lehman Optoelectronics' chief secretary stated that if there are third-party test reports or solutions through legal channels, the company will face “quality disputes between the two parties can be resolved through consultation or legal means.” .

The secretary secretly stated at the end that "the company's clarification announcement was very clear and true, and it will not respond."